Tyler Winklevoss, co-founder of Crypto exchange Gemini, recently took to social media to criticize the crypto stance of Vice President Kamala Harris, labeling it as a “scam”. This comes in light of the Federal Reserve’s crackdown on Customers Bank, a crypto-friendly bank in the U.S. Winklevoss’ comments come shortly after Harris failed to attend a roundtable discussion with crypto leaders on Aug 8.
In his post, Winklevoss delves into the specifics of the Federal Reserve’s enforcement action against Customers Bank, which involved issuing a 13-page document outlining new guidelines for the bank. One of the key points in the enforcement action is that Customers Bank must provide the Federal Reserve with a thirty-day notice before establishing new banking relationships with crypto firms.
As one of the few crypto-friendly banks in the U.S., Winklevoss believes that this enforcement action creates a choke point for crypto companies. By placing the Federal Reserve as a “direct gatekeeper” between crypto firms and their ability to secure new bank accounts, the autonomy of banks to make independent decisions is severely limited. This centralized control, according to Winklevoss, goes against the principles of decentralized regulation that the crypto industry stands for.
Winklevoss goes on to question the validity of the Federal Reserve’s allegations against Customers Bank, describing them as “non-allegation allegations” that lack substance and evidence. The lack of transparency in the enforcement action raises concerns about the true motives behind the Federal Reserve’s actions and the potential implications for the broader banking industry.
In a bold statement, Winklevoss accuses the Federal Reserve of having a hidden agenda in targeting Customers Bank. He suggests that the real purpose behind the enforcement action is to gain unlawful control over the bank’s decision-making process and dictate which industries they can serve. This power play, according to Winklevoss, sets a dangerous precedent for the future of banking regulations and the autonomy of financial institutions.
As Winklevoss continues to unravel the complexities of the Federal Reserve’s actions, he warns that this crackdown is only the beginning. He suggests that if Harris were to win the upcoming election, the restrictions on crypto-friendly banks would only intensify, signaling a shift towards more restrictive policies and government control over the industry.
Winklevoss’ critical analysis sheds light on the questionable motives and lack of transparency surrounding the Federal Reserve’s enforcement action against Customers Bank. The implications of this crackdown go beyond just one bank and have far-reaching consequences for the entire crypto industry. As the landscape of financial regulations continues to evolve, it is crucial to question authority and hold institutions accountable for their actions.
Leave a Reply